Friday, March 28, 2014

Silly unstranded preposition at the BBC

Spotted on the BBC News website
  • The three [South Korean mobile networks] are selling the phone now to get round government restrictions on to whom they can sell new handsets.
Presumably the writer was trying to avoid ending the sentence with a preposition. But this is a case where by trying to follow a non-existent rule the writer has ended up with a totally unnatural sentence.

The problem is that after restrictions on we expect a noun phrase, for example - restrictions on sales of new handsets. But here we have a preposition followed by a preposition phrase, which just sounds weird.
Sometimes on to whom, although formal, works, for example here:
  • ... who first had it, (and) who passed it on to whom?
Here we have a question, and pass (something) on is a phrasal verb, so it's much like saying - who passed it to whom. But we could also strand the preposition (put it to the end):
  • ... who first had it, and who did they pass it on to?
These examples (found at Google Books), although borderline, just about work, I think because on here is not dependent on the previous word and on to could really be written as onto. We could certainly treat on to whom as one chunk when speaking:
  • This standard has been criticised because it assumes that clients are inert material on to whom active ingredients are poured by identical therapeutic technicians
  • identifying omnipotently with the envied aspects of the person on to whom the projection has been made
  • especially as there had been no suitable female person on to whom he could carry over his libido
  • these failures are motivated by our need for subalterns on to whom we can externalize and enact our own rejected qualities
But for me the following (also found at Google Books) simply doesn't work:
  • It depends on to whom you are talking
In this example, it would be much more natural to simply put the preposition to the end, as do most other examples at Google Books. You then have a choice between going for the more formal whom, or just using who. Compare these numbers at Google Books
  • It depends on who you talk to - 45
  • It depends on whom you talk to - 47
  • It depends on to whom you talk - 11
These other examples from Google Books fall into the same (unnatural) boat:
  • depending on to whom she is speaking at a given moment in her community
  • What is disclosed may vary as well, depending on to whom one discloses
In more formal writing it is very often possible to start with a preposition and follow it with whom - the man to whom she was speaking. But there are other times when it simply doesn't work, and that BBC example is one of them. So let's forget this silly 'rule' about not stranding prepositions, and simply write:
  • The three are selling the phone now to get round government restrictions on who(m) they can sell new handsets to.
  • or perhaps better:
  • The three are selling the phone now to get round government restrictions on sales of new handsets.

Link

2 comments:

novak dj said...

Am here to testify what this great spell caster done for me. i never believe in spell casting, until when i was was tempted to try it. i and my wife have been having a lot of problem living together, she will always not make me happy because she have fallen in love with another man outside our relationship, i tried my best to make sure that my wife leave this woman but the more i talk to her the more she makes me fell sad, so my marriage is now leading to divorce because she no longer gives me attention. so with all this pain and agony, i decided to contact this spell caster to see if things can work out between me and my wife again. this spell caster who was a man told me that my wife is really under a great spell that she have been charm by some magic, so he told me that he was going to make all things normal back. he did the spell on my wife and after 5 days my wife changed completely she even apologize with the way she treated me that she was not her self, i really thank this man his name is Dr ose he have bring back my wife back to me i want you all to contact him who are having any problem related to marriage issue and relationship problem he will solve it for you. his email is oseremenspelltemple@gmail.com  he is a man and his  great. wish you good time.
He cast spells for different purposes like
(1) If you want your ex back.
(2) if you always have bad dream
(3) You want to be promoted in your office.
(4) You want women/men to run after you.
(5) If you want a child.
(6) You want to be rich.
(7) You want to tie your husband/wife to be yours forever.
(8) If you need financial assistance.
(9) HIV/AIDS CURE
(10) is the only answer to that your problem of winning the lottery

Contact him today on oseremenspelltemple@gmail.com or whatsapp him on +2348136482342.  https://www.facebook.com/Dr-odion-spell-temple

Ric Clayton said...

I really want to thank Dr Emu for saving my marriage. My wife really treated me badly and left home for almost 3 month this got me sick and confused. Then I told my friend about how my wife has changed towards me. Then she told me to contact Dr Emu that he will help me bring back my wife and change her back to a good woman. I never believed in all this but I gave it a try. Dr Emu casted a spell of return of love on her, and my wife came back home for forgiveness and today we are happy again. If you are going through any relationship stress or you want back your Ex or Divorce husband you can contact his whatsapp +2347012841542 or email emutemple@gmail.com website: Https://emutemple.wordpress.com/ Https://web.facebook.com/Emu-Temple-104891335203341